7 Major Reasons Britain Adopted Indirect Rule in British West Africa

So why did the British adopt the Indirect Rule system in administering their West African colonies during the colonial period?

Well, you will now know the reasons why Britain introduced Indirect Rule to British West Africa.

But I think it is proper for us to get a clear meaning of the term “Indirect Rule” first.

The Meaning of Indirect Rule

From the 1920s onwards, the British adopted a system of administration known as Indirect Rule to administer their territories in British West Africa.

Under this system, the traditional rulers (chiefs) were the main instruments by which the British executed their policies.

Where there were no chiefs with traditional authority, the British appointed so-called “warrant chiefs” to constitute traditional authorities.

The British constituted the traditional administrative set-up into what was known as Native Authorities. The head of a Native Authority was the traditional ruler. They were assisted by councils of elders.

Indirect Rule was first introduced into Northern Nigeria by Lord Frederick Lugard.

The British, unlike the French, rejected the idea of imposing European culture on Africans. In the words of Governor Gordon Guggisberg “We must aim at the development of the people along their own racial lines and not at the wholesale replacement of their civilization by our own”.

They, therefore, maintained the traditional African political institutions and ruled indirectly through the local chiefs.

Reasons for the introduction of Indirect Rule

You can now have a summary of the reasons why, unlike France, Britain chose Indirect Rule to administer the affairs of her West African colonies.

1. Financial Reasons

The British Empire at this time was very large and recruiting British officials at all levels and in all the colonial territories would be costly. Indirect rule was cheaper since local rulers could be used.

Moreover, by the end of World War I (1914-1918), Britain had suffered a great deal in terms of manpower and other economic resources. Thus, the policy of Indirect Rule was meant to take care of the financial difficulties at home.

2. Shortage of personnel

Most British nationals were unwilling to work in the colonies because they thought they were primitive and underdeveloped.

3. Laissez-Faire policy back in Britain

The British themselves were practising a liberal, decentralized form of political administration and wanted to do the same in the colonies.

11 Causes of the Rise of Nationalism in Africa

12 Features of Democracy

Top 9 Sources of Local Government Revenue

WASSCE 2000 Government Past Questions and Answers

4. Desire for minimal interference in local affairs

The British would not like to be seen as interfering too much in the affairs of the indigenous people. This might cause anger among them and work against the objectives of colonial rule.

5. The existence of an efficient centralized political system

This was particularly the case in Northern Nigeria

The British only needed to use this well-established bureaucracy. E.g. courts, police, prisons, tax system etc.

6. Problems of communication

Language and travel barriers necessitated the use of indigenous rulers at the local level.

7. Experience elsewhere

Lord Lugard who introduced indirect rule in Northern Nigeria had a successful similar experience in Uganda. Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles was also successful in Malaya and Singapore. The British were therefore convinced it was the best system to adopt.

Did you find this information helpful? Then share it on your favourite social media platform for the benefit of others you care about. Thank you!

9 thoughts on “7 Major Reasons Britain Adopted Indirect Rule in British West Africa”

  1. Hey Ralph! can you help with the factor why did British adopt indirect approach in the pacific island countries?

    1. Hello Marcus. Thank you for reaching out. Yes, I can help you. Teachers use syllabuses, textbooks and other reliable sources available to them. Please, let me know if you need any assistance. The goal for preparing students for a standardized international examination is always the same. And I’m very much focused on that goal which is the core objective of this blog. For that matter, I will also appreciate it very much if you can quickly draw my attention to any statements you might consider untrue. I love learning and I am willing to learn from you. Thank you so much.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top